News
Germany working to impose human rights and environmental supply chain protections by 2021
25 Aug 2020Germany is taking the lead on human rights and environmental protections in the European Union. The country plans to pass a Supply Chain Law that will oblige companies to analyze whether their business activities have an adverse effect on recognized human rights and environmental standards.
The new law will oblige German-based companies with more than 500 employees to ensure that minimum social and ecological standards are being met not only in their own supply chains but also within those of their suppliers, which are often in developing and emerging countries. The law will also require companies to take steps to counteract any breaches of minimum standards to eradicate destructive environmental practices and human rights violations.
This law has widespread support from NGOs and food and beverage manufacturers, including grocery chain Rewe, coffee manufacture Tchibo, Nestlé and Ritter Sport. An alliance of 64 nonprofits and German trade unions, including Human Rights Watch, supports the legislation. However, there is lingering controversy surrounds the proposed law. German business associations and the Minister for Economics Peter Altmaier voiced concerns that such a law would put additional burdens on companies already beleaguered by the economic ramifications of Covid-19. Despite these arguments, a report from Kearney shows that the pandemic has pushed environmental concerns even further to the forefront of consumers’ minds.
Since 2016, there has been support within the country to outline some sort of framework that establishes human rights and environmental due diligence requirements for companies. While there has yet to be any formal legislation mandating or enforcing standards, there have been plenty of voluntary efforts form private companies, and the country itself has set a goal of having 50% of its large corporations mitigating human rights and ecological violations.
However, two voluntary surveys have shown Germany is nowhere close to having 50% of its companies with more than 500 employees identifying, preventing and mitigating the adverse human rights and environmental effects associated with their business activities. In fact, in the first survey from 2019, not even 20% of surveyed companies achieve the requirements outlined in Germany’s National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights (NAP), which is based on the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights. Companies surveyed this year fared marginally better with 22% meeting NAP’s requirements.
These results show that a voluntary commitment is insufficient and has further fueled the support behind a mandatory human rights due diligence law in Germany. In 2018, the governing coalition in Germany determined that such a law would be passed should the country’s voluntary effort prove ineffective, DW reported. Now, the plan is to adopt a mandatory framework by 2021.
Related news
Danish Crown’s ‘climate-controlled’ claim misleading, court finds
20 Mar 2024
Leading EU pork producer Danish Crown has been found guilty of greenwashing by misleading consumers with marketing claims about its “climate-controlled” pork and “climate-friendly” production.
Read moreUltra-processed food intake in South Africa at concerning levels, study suggests
19 Mar 2024
As South Africa considers introducing front-of-pack warning labels and strict marketing limits for unhealthy foods, research has found that low-income South Africans get around half of their calories from ultra-processed foods (UPFs) – “a cause for con...
Read moreBrazilian manufacturers must comply with warning label regulation, says court
7 Mar 2024
The Federal Court of São Paulo has ruled that Brazilian manufacturers must comply with front-of-pack labelling regulation that requires unhealthy products to feature warning labels, scrapping a last-minute one-year extension.
Read moreUS pet food regulations unravel the mysteries of product labelling
4 Mar 2024
New regulations governing the labelling of pet foods were approved by AAFCO members last July, providing the first major update to pet food regulations in 40 years. The move was a response to pet owners asking for clarity on labels that left many confu...
Read morePesticide residues in conventional baby food: A boost for organic?
29 Feb 2024
Nearly four in 10 (38%) of conventional US baby food products contain pesticide residues, according to research that also found that the organic samples were pesticide-free. Could this be an opportunity for organic or ‘pesticide-free’ produce?
Read moreSingapore's Islamic council: Cultivated meat can be halal
16 Feb 2024
The Islamic Religious Council of Singapore (MUIS) has said that cultivated meat consumption is permissible as halal under certain conditions, and where a more “rigorous” set of requirements are needed to ensure consumer assurance.
Read more‘Not for EU’ label signals confusion and extra costs
6 Feb 2024
With affordability, variety, and choice paramount in today’s uncertain landscape, concerns exist around the UK’s “Not for EU” label.
Read morePlant-based and processed: Avoiding the next big health debate
2 Feb 2024
Calls for clarity around ultra-processed food (UPFs) and ongoing debates on potential classification may bring the health credentials of plant-based food under the spotlight, which is why education is so necessary.
Read moreIs it useful to classify foods as ultra-processed?
26 Jan 2024
The term ‘ultra-processed’ is gaining traction – and notoriety. But does it help consumers make healthier food choices or encourage manufacturers to make their ultra-processed products healthier? Food industry stakeholders explored the term’s usefulnes...
Read more‘Healthy’ additives make ultra-processed foods more appealing
4 Jan 2024
Almost three-quarters (74%) of Americans would try an ultra-processed food if it provided a health benefit such as better sleep, better immunity, or increased energy, according to an industry survey.
Read more